I am not usually a movie person but after watching The Devil Wears Prada 2 twice (because apparently I now conduct billionaire psychology research in theaters), I had to sit down and discuss this movie with the women in my life.
And before anyone says “Kalie it’s just a fashion movie,” no. Absolutely not!
Underneath the coats, handbags, intimidating assistants, luxury penthouses, and suspiciously moisturized billionaires was actually a very sharp conversation about feminine power, reinvention, visibility, and honestly… emotional exhaustion.
Now if you never watched the original The Devil Wears Prada, here is the simple version. A smart young woman accidentally enters the elite world of fashion media working for the terrifyingly iconic Miranda Priestly. The first movie is really about ambition, identity, image, and what happens when a woman realizes she may want more out of life than what everyone originally expected from her.
The second movie feels older though. Richer. Wiser. Slightly more emotionally dehydrated.
The women are no longer trying to “make it.” They already made it. Now they are dealing with the aftermath of success: divorce, legacy, motherhood, aging, loneliness, power, public image, and the uncomfortable realization that some dreams cost more than women are allowed to admit out loud.
But whew… the BEST part of the movie was absolutely the billionaire subplot.
Because the Justin Theroux character, Benji Barnes, was very obviously a blend of Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk.
If you spend any time around tech culture, startup founders, venture capital circles, AI conversations, media spaces, or rich people trying to become “culturally relevant,” you immediately understand what the writers are doing. The character basically embodied: “man discovers protein, cryotherapy, wealth, and a skincare routine after becoming a billionaire.”
Suddenly he has abs. A jawline. A philosophical podcast. A yacht. A younger glamorous girlfriend. And somehow now wants to save humanity through AI while also attending the Met Gala. Classic.
And honestly, the movie was not really mocking wealth. It was mocking performative reinvention. That distinction matters because modern billionaire culture increasingly feels less like “I built a successful company” and more like “I must now become an aesthetic.”
The luxury compounds. The hyper-optimization. The curated relationships. The image laundering through fashion, philanthropy, media, and wellness culture. Everyone suddenly wants to become a philosopher-king-slash-spiritual-guru-slash-cultural tastemaker with a supplement line and a documentary deal.
But the real brilliance of the movie was not actually the billionaire himself.
It was the ex-wife.
More specifically, the character very clearly inspired by MacKenzie Scott.
And THIS is where the movie became emotionally intelligent.
Because while everyone else in the film was fighting for visibility, fighting to stay beautiful, culturally relevant, socially admired, photographed, desired, feared, envied, trending, invited, validated, this woman moved through the movie with almost no performance at all.
No desperation. No proving. No emotional chaos. Just quiet power.
And honestly? I think that is why so many women had such an emotional reaction to her character. Because she represented something we almost never see portrayed deeply anymore: a woman who is powerful without needing constant attention.
Whew.
That part sat with me.
Especially as someone building in the tech world right now where performance has somehow become a full-time job. Everyone is branding. Everyone is optimizing. Everyone is building a personal empire online. Everyone is performing wellness while clearly needing electrolytes, sleep, and a therapist.
And women especially are expected to publicly perform EVERYTHING beautifully. Beauty. Motherhood. Marriage. Healing. Success. Softness. Luxury. Fitness. Emotional intelligence. Career ambition. Femininity. All at the exact same time. Preferably with good lighting and neutral-toned linen somewhere in the background.
Meanwhile the MacKenzie Scott–inspired character represented something much quieter. Discernment. Privacy. Self-possession. Intelligence. Restraint. Mature femininity.
Not weak. Not passive. Not invisible. Just deeply anchored.
Even the styling told the story. While everyone else looked like they were participating in luxury warfare, she wore softer luxury. The kind of elegance that whispers instead of screams. The kind of wealth that no longer needs to prove it belongs in the room because it already owns the building.
Her voice stayed calm. Her language stayed intentional. There was almost no emotional volatility around her despite the implication that she had every reason to be bitter.
And honestly? That was the flex.
The movie quietly asks a question that I think many women are beginning to ask themselves in real life: What if the most powerful woman in the room is actually the one least interested in competing for attention?
WHEW.
Because I truly think culture is shifting. Women are starting to realize that visibility and power are not always the same thing. Sometimes the most emotionally evolved women become quieter after heartbreak. Not smaller. Not less intelligent. Not less ambitious. Just less performative.
Life humbles them enough that they stop needing constant validation from strangers, social media, status, or proximity to powerful men.
And maybe that is why the character felt almost restorative to watch.
She symbolized the type of woman I think many ambitious women secretly hope they become one day: still soft, still elegant, still kind, still emotionally intelligent… without becoming consumed by spectacle, bitterness, ego, or the exhausting need to prove something every five business days.
Also side note: the fact that modern culture increasingly finds the quiet philanthropic ex-wife more compelling than the billionaire himself is honestly one of the funniest plot twists of our generation.
Always Have, Always Will ~ Kalie
P.S. Had to share some of my favorite quotes in the movie!
“May the bridges I burn light my way.” — Emily
“You’re not a visionary, you’re a vendor.” — Miranda
“Well, look what T.J. Maxx dragged in.” — Nigel
“Shared carbs have no calories.” — Emily
“You can’t rebrand emptiness with wellness.” — Miranda
“That’s all.” — Miranda





Leave a Reply